WebApr 10, 2024 · Guo v. Ashcroft, No. 03-2972. Document Cited authorities 23 Cited in 284 Precedent Map Related. ... Parties: Jian Lian GUO, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States Respondent. Docket Number: No. 03-2972. Decision Date: 25 October 2004: 386 F.3d 556 Jian Lian GUO, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney … Mendez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 340 F.3d 865, 869 n. 6 (9th Cir. 2003) (stating that this court "must affirm the BIA's finding on eligibility for asylum if it is supported by substantial evidence"). Having found that the IJ's determination was not supported by substantial evidence, we accept Mr. Guo's testimony as true. Chen v. See more Mr. Guo contends that his petition for review should be granted because substantial evidence does not support the IJ's finding that his … See more The IJ also found that Mr. Guo was not credible because he failed to corroborate his testimony that he was fired from his job after he was … See more The IJ found that Mr. Guo's testimony that he was a Christian before he entered the United States was not credible. In this respect, the IJ stated: "The Court does not believe that the respondent has provided any credible proof … See more The IJ also based her adverse credibility finding on the fact that Mr. Guo testified he could not remember the name of the company that he had written on his B-1 visa application. The … See more
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED - United States Court of …
Weband required to report to the police weekly); see also Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004) (totality of the circumstances compelled finding of persecution). Thus, we grant the petition for review as to Guo’s asylum and withholding of removal claims, and remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this ... WebGuo v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 556, 562 (3d Cir. 2004). “As a general rule, motions to reopen are granted only under compelling circumstances,” id. at 561, and we will not disturb the BIA’s “[d]iscretionary decisions . . . unless they are found to be arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” id. at 562 (quoting Tipu v. merril jessop wives
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WebGet free access to the complete judgment in GUO v. ASHCROFT on CaseMine. WebJul 30, 2024 · Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004). III. ANALYSIS. A. Asylum and withholding of removal "To be statutorily eligible for asylum, [a petitioner] must show that he is a refugee." Baghdasaryan v. Holder, 592 F.3d 1018, 1022-23 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)). "A refugee is one who is 'unable or unwilling to avail ... WebApr 10, 2024 · Jian Lian GUO, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States Respondent. No. 03-2972. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. … merrill 900 offer